Wht not send attachments to interested people or stick them on a web site to avoid cluttering the system.
On 7/12/06, Don Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I would have thought so, but at the same time there are users here who don't mind attachments at all. Nick made a posting last night with a very valid attachment, which for some would still have been more than they want (him included as he's standing on principle, not system impact). Cheers Don David Mann wrote: > On Jul 12, 2006, at 2:36 PM, Rik Tindall wrote: > >> You have to draw the line somewhere. 3-K? 5-K? Why not just save us >> all the brainache, just for once, and stick with Usenix-like >> convention - 0-K of attachments are what treats most people nicest. > > It'd be easier to set the list server to strip out all attachments. No > policing required. > > - Dave -- Don Gould www.thinkdesignprint.co.nz - www.tcn.bowenvale.co.nz - www.bowenvale.co.nz - SkypeMe: ThinkDesignPrint
-- David Merrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
