Since I've upgraded from Ubuntu Breezy (5.10) to Dapper (6.06), I can't
get my Epson Perfection 2450 Photo scanner to work in Linux.

In Breezy, xsane would work provided I ran it twice (i.e. open - close -
open again).  On the initial run, xsane would find the scanner
immediately, but it wouldn't operate it.  On the second run, xsane would
take many seconds to find the scanner, but would then operate it
normally.

Now in Dapper, xsane takes many seconds to find the scanner and still
won't operate it; trying to scan yields, after some more utter
inactivity, "Failed to start scanner: Error during device I/O".  Closing
and rerunning xsane produces an identical result.  So does running it as
root via sudo.

xscanimage (which also used to work in Breezy, the rare time I'd try it
out) fails similarly with the same message.

I've downloaded and installed the Epson-Kowa (Avasys) program iscan.  It
fails with the message "Could not send command to scanner.  Check the
scanner's status."  That's both as a normal user and as root.

lsusb yields 
Bus 004 Device 003: ID 04b8:0112 Seiko Epson Corp. Perfection 2450

scanimage -L yields
device `epson:libusb:004:003' is a Epson GT-9700 flatbed scanner

sane-find-scanner yields
found USB scanner (vendor=0x04b8 [EPSON], product=0x0112 [EPSON
Scanner]) at libusb:004:003

I've tried commenting out the "scsi Epson" line in
the /etc/sane.d/epson.conf file, but that makes no difference.
Likewise, no difference when I add the manufacturer and product no. in
the line which otherwise reads simply "usb".  iscan uses the alternative
config file /etc/sane.d/epkowa.conf, and I've done the same to that
file, to no avail.

I've tried kooka but it doesn't even throw up any warning windows - just
doesn't activate the scanner.

I've tried the scanner on my wife's AMD-64 (also running Dapper), and
xsane behaves identically (to my knowledge she hasn't got any other
scanning software).

The scanner does work on my machine in WinXP, although it does crash
every few pages and has to be powered off and on again to reset.  (It's
shown that misbehaviour for years.)

Google is NOT being my friend for this issue.

Any ideas?

=====Andrew



Reply via email to