Chris Hellyar wrote: > I don't want to publicly slander Telecom, seeing as I've already named > them as the vendor, so I wont go into detail. In the vaguest of terms > there were some compromises in the design and implementation. > > I signed off on the spec, so I was/am part of the problem in the > business sense, but at some point the vendor should be tell us we're > stuffing popcorn up a dead goats nose instead of fiddling around with > the thing trying to make it work for 2 years. > > What is wrong with the Nortel solution? Must be serious to consider an upgrade after 2 years!
