---- Rik Tindall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Christopher Sawtell wrote: > > On Thursday 16 November 2006 17:03, Wesley Parish wrote: > >> I would be interested - mostly in hearing their excuses. > > > > <quote> > > > > PLEASE NOTE: This message is not to be taken as a trigger for animated > > discussions about the politics involved in writing software. If you want to > > do that please start a fresh thread. I don't want to have to spend ages > > sorting out the rants from the bookings. > > > > </quote> > > > > Please start another thread if you want to continue the discussion. > > > > NOTE: Merely changing the Subject: line does _NOT_ start a new thread. > > You have to post a new mail to the list to start a new thread. > > > > -- > > CS > > I am very happy to see this meeting proceed. > It proves, once and for all, incontrovertibly, that: > > Microsoft = 'Open Source' = 'Linux' (GNot) > > -- > Rik Tindall, InfoHelp Services <http://www.infohelp.co.nz> on virus-free > Ubuntu GNU/Linux 6.06 freeOS, 2.6.15-27-686 kernel, GNOME 2.14.3 desktop > OpenOffice.org 2.0.2 suite, Mozilla.org Firefox 1.5.0.7 web browser and > Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 email, gEdit 2.14.4 web editor, gFTP 2.0.18 fileXfer
Microsoft = 'open source'? What the...?
