Don Gould wrote:
>
>
> Nick Rout wrote:
>> You still haven't told us where the delays are occurring, so the whole
>> conversation has been pointless.
>
> No it hasn't.
>
> Most people haven't responded, indicating that most people are not
> seeing any issue.
interesting conclusion to draw, though total rubbish...
>
> Of those who have responded, they have expressed that while they see a
> minor issue it's not affecting them largely.
>
> Hence, I'm not going to bother track down the delays.
>
> Case closed.
what, just because you say it is, it is closed? it would have been
quite interesting to have a brief summary of what the mail headers were
telling you, clearly you have the time. looking through one message's
header doesn't take long. instead following this thread has been a
waste of time. maybe people have better/other things to do, like work,
or contribute productively to this list?
