...and you need to be careful about getting the timezones correct.
Carl. On 30/03/07, Steve Holdoway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...except that all but the last one can be forged (: Steve On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 13:13:41 +1200 (NZST) Nick Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, March 29, 2007 10:31 pm, Don Gould wrote: > > Ok, seems that there is an issue and some people are interested in > > seeing it investigated further. > > > > Next time I notice it happen to me I'll mark the offending posts and > > post the headers for the experts to review. > > > > Cheers Don > > Don, you don't need an expert. Read the things yourself. > > For Don and anyone else who hasn't got the gumption to figure it out for > yourself, the headers have a series of "Received" headers. Each time the > message goes through an smtp server another Received header gets written, > including the time the message was received by that server. eg: > > Received: from smtp.aon.co.nz ([203.21.31.218]) > by matt.hosts.net.nz with esmtp (Exim 4.50) > id 1HX3gU-0005Yz-Fm > for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:05:38 +1200 > > If a message goes through smoothly the times at the end of the "received" > line will show the messages being passed within a few seconds. > > Look for the big time gaps, and you'll see where the message was held up. > > Simple. No expert needed. > > -- > Nick Rout > >
