On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:47 PM, dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 04 November 2008 23:34:02 Christopher Sawtell wrote: >> 2008/11/4 Zane Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> Funnily enough, the one time support would have been welcome (this >> > >> > issue >> > >> >> took months to resolve) both Oracle NZ and RedHat were absolutely >> >> useless. Wandering through source code eventually highlighted the >> > >> > issue >> > >> >> which was resolved quite effectively once the cause was found. >> > >> > Yes, >> > I think that is my experience too. >> > If you are a reasonably knowledgeable sysadmin or whatever, any support >> > you want is going >> > to be for a relatively obscure problem which is unlikely to be >> > something a phone-support person is able to deal with. >> >> You might also care to consider one of the *BSDs. >> >> FreeBSD is _very_ stable for server use. > > if so then OpenBSD would be even better wouldn't (I mean it's the server > version so to speak) FreeBSD is the desktop version so to speak i mean. > eg netbsd = network server, OpenBSD = web server, FreeBSD = desktop etc. > > I stand to be corrected on this tho. >
you are corrected.
