On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Derek Smithies <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010, Ryan McCoskrie wrote: > >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:11:47 Derek Smithies wrote: >>> >>> My first thought was for the 42nd of the month, but it is a bit large. >>> The 24 would work though. >>> >> 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 all fit nicely onto the topic. Shame that we can't use 0. > > 24 is 1 date > 24 is the concatanation of 2 and 4 > 24 is the sum of 8 and 16 > > On that basis, I think I have to vote again for 24.
OTOH with primes being so important to technology these days, 17 seemed a good choice! (or 19,23, not 29, not 31 or we'd be taking months off, 29 is stuffed in February)
