On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Ryan McCoskrie <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:11:47 Derek Smithies wrote: >> On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Christopher Sawtell wrote: >> > What about settling on the 17 of the month. That's Wednesday next week >> > to start it off. >> >> Sigh - - a group of geeks can surely come up with a better number than >> 17. >> >> My first thought was for the 42nd of the month, but it is a bit large. >> The 24 would work though. >> > 1, 2, 4, 8, 16 all fit nicely onto the topic. Shame that we can't use 0.
I guess 0 would be the last day of each month (or even the previous month)
