On Saturday 11 May 2002 12:13 am, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, 10 May 2002 21:50:22 -0400 > > "Leon A. Goldstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's sad to see a company that produced a gem like eDesk 2.4 > > in trouble. > > ... Caldera's LIZARD was what started my Linux odyssey. > > I have a sentimental attachment to Caldera. > > Well, I'm exactly there myself, having started with Caldera 2.3 after > extensive research, and sticking with them until version 3, at which > time the cost and licensing turned me away. I just installed 3.1.1 a few > days ago and find it solid. Have tried many, currently am trying > elxlinux, which is full featured, interesting, but bloated. they threw > in the kitchen sink. Still like Libranet, but haven't gotten around to > version 2 yet. I'm thinking about going with Suse, since most who use it > seem satisfied. >
Why is Caldera, which offers a free download, *bad*, while Suse, which doesn't offer a free download, *good*? Just wondering... -- Caldera eWorkstation 3.1+, kernel 2.4.18, KDE 3.0 from source, Xfree86 4.1.0 8:00am up 11 days, 10:51, 2 users, load average: 0.68, 0.68, 0.70 It's what you learn AFTER you know it all that counts _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
