> Why is Caldera, which offers a free download, *bad*, while Suse, which > doesn't offer a free download, *good*? > Just wondering...
This question got me thinking. This applies to Libranet also, which freely offers just an older version, somewhat dated. (However, it's debian compatible for updates.) In my case I'm trying elx linux because I'm a hobbyist, and don't need linux for business, and don't like outdated programs, preferring more toward the bleeding edge, and elx is there, and free, at least at the present. (However, the download of the new version has been trying for a couple of days and only succeeded to 30%, having to restart every hour due to drops. It's on ibiblio and redhat just released on the same server.) In fairness, I am enjoying Caldera 3.1.1. It seems quick, responsive, uncluttered. I added xfce to the login menu by simply going to login manager and adding "startxfce" to the sessions. No hassle at all, unlike some, which require scripts be modified, etc. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
