Scribbling feverishly on May 12, dep managed to emit: > hey, gang! > > y'know what the world needs? yet another linux distribution!
And more reporters! ;-) > anyway, the distributions have gone kind of haywire, off in all kinds > of goofy directions. so what i'm wondering is how difficult it would > be to put together a modern distribution based on 2.4, with > everything simply updated to newer stuff. i've been through a whole > collection of other distros, and they all fall short -- rh puts stuff > in weird places; suse is just too damned, well, suse; debian is > debian and slack is slack; mandrake tends to be rh only broken. and > so on. and fact is, the distro i want to be running is caldera 2.4 > upgraded to the current century. Joe Cheek's Lycoris (nee Redmond Linux, a near-clone of eDesktop 2.4) may come pretty close. I haven't played with it, though. > suppose a recipe for this could be cooked up? Yup. I don't have time to do it. Kurt -- An idea is not responsible for the people who believe in it. _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
