On Monday 13 May 2002 13:01, dep wrote: > hey, gang! > > y'know what the world needs? yet another linux distribution! SNIP > anyway, the distributions have gone kind of haywire, off in all kinds > of goofy directions. so what i'm wondering is how difficult it would > be to put together a modern distribution based on 2.4, with > everything simply updated to newer stuff. i've been through a whole > collection of other distros, and they all fall short -- rh puts stuff > in weird places; suse is just too damned, well, suse; debian is > debian and slack is slack; mandrake tends to be rh only broken. and > so on. and fact is, the distro i want to be running is caldera 2.4 > upgraded to the current century. > > suppose a recipe for this could be cooked up?
That I would go for as I am as you know sick of most of the others, plus the inability of Caldera to maintain itself. I do like Caldera as a distro, but as said it needs modernising from install up. I would help in any way I could. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
