On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 18:27:25 -0500 Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:15 pm, dep wrote: > > begin Collins's quote: > > | Much material here for any number of flame wars. I only have > > one| question. How does a system that "slavishly adheres to the > > fhs"| handle instalation of new versions (or, God forbid, parallel > > | versions) of a monstrosity like kde? > > > > it puts them on /opt/[dirname], as god intended. > > Is there somewhere a Cliff Notes version of FHS or maybe 'FHS for > Stoopid People' that is a quick read to get the gist? > > I tried reading the real thing and managed to learn precisely > nothing. >
The more I learn about this beast, the more I believe, dep perhaps an execption, that the FHS is for Stoopid People. I can only thank my lucky stars that I have stumbled on a distro that is not slavishly complient to the FHS, read: the Redhat approach. There's more religion to this than RMS could conjure up. I'm sorry now that I opened up this can of worms. -- Collins Richey - Denver Area - WWTLRD? gentoo(since 01/01/01) 2.4.18+(ext3) xfce-sylpheed-mozilla _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
