Collins wrote: > On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 18:27:25 -0500 Michael Hipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >>On Saturday 29 June 2002 06:15 pm, dep wrote: >> >>>begin Collins's quote: >>>| Much material here for any number of flame wars. I only have >>>one| question. How does a system that "slavishly adheres to the >>>fhs"| handle instalation of new versions (or, God forbid, parallel >>>| versions) of a monstrosity like kde? >>> >>>it puts them on /opt/[dirname], as god intended. >> >>Is there somewhere a Cliff Notes version of FHS or maybe 'FHS for >>Stoopid People' that is a quick read to get the gist? >> >>I tried reading the real thing and managed to learn precisely >>nothing. >> > > > The more I learn about this beast, the more I believe, dep perhaps an > execption, that the FHS is for Stoopid People. > > I can only thank my lucky stars that I have stumbled on a distro that > is not slavishly complient to the FHS, read: the Redhat approach.
What does Redhat have to do with this? Redhat isn't following the FHS any more than your beloved gentoo. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ L. Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo: http://netllama.ipfox.com 7:15pm up 72 days, 2:03, 2 users, load average: 0.11, 0.45, 0.57 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list - http://linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users Subscribe/Unsubscribe info, Archives,and Digests are located at the above URL.
