On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 23:51, Keith Antoine wrote: > On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:01, Bob Raymond wrote: > > I finally got 2.5.40 compiled, by applying the BK4 patch. It's > > definitely different from 2.4.19. Sound quality is definitely better (I > > have a Turtle Beach Santa Cruz), and I like having Alsa part of the > > kernel now. It seems somewhat slower, though, and hogs my memory. I'll > > admit to using bloatware, but as soon as KDE gets fired up, I check > > free, and it reports about 400mb of RAM in use, whereas I only used > > about 150 to 200mb with 2.4.19. I don't think my data's about to get > > lost, so I'd say if you're feeling up to a new kernel, try this one. > > > > > > Bob Raymond > > I am stuck with 2.5.40, so what is a BK4 patch when its at home ?
BK4 patch is latest from the BitKeeper tree. I needed it to get XFS to compile. I'm not terribly happy with the kernel, as it's messed up USB printing slightly- getting that sorted out right now. Bob Raymond _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
