On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 09:15, Bob Raymond wrote: > On Sat, 2002-10-05 at 23:51, Keith Antoine wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Oct 2002 07:01, Bob Raymond wrote: > > > I finally got 2.5.40 compiled, by applying the BK4 patch. It's > > > definitely different from 2.4.19. Sound quality is definitely better > > > (I have a Turtle Beach Santa Cruz), and I like having Alsa part of the > > > kernel now. It seems somewhat slower, though, and hogs my memory. > > > I'll admit to using bloatware, but as soon as KDE gets fired up, I > > > check free, and it reports about 400mb of RAM in use, whereas I only > > > used about 150 to 200mb with 2.4.19. I don't think my data's about to > > > get lost, so I'd say if you're feeling up to a new kernel, try this > > > one. > > > > > > > > > Bob Raymond > > > > I am stuck with 2.5.40, so what is a BK4 patch when its at home ? > > BK4 patch is latest from the BitKeeper tree. I needed it to get XFS to > compile. I'm not terribly happy with the kernel, as it's messed up USB > printing slightly- getting that sorted out right now. > > Bob Raymond
Thanks, but seeing that I do not run XFS I do not need the patch, but I cannot get it to compile as yet cleanly. -- Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'skippy' 18 Arkana St, The Gap, Queensland 4061 Australia PH:61733002161 Retired Geriatric, Sometime Electronics Engineer, Knowall, Brain in storage _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
