note. for the exactly same rationale behind my orignial question,
I want a no-security NTFS support as well..
so the brand and crapness (scale 0-10) of the OS (be it linux or M$) is
irrelevant. :)
> Unfortunately (a) the default security settings on the w2k machines seem to
> be too open, (b) there have been numerous security holes in Microsoft's
> software including IIS, and SQL Server to name just 2, and (c) Microsoft's
> attempts at security have been deeply flawed, to the point that they're
> termed ``Kindergarten Cryptographer'' mistakes by some security
> professionals.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news://news.hkpcug.org /( _ )\ http://www.linux-sxs.org
^ ^
http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
