that means i have to recompile all programs that depends on openssl? doh... maybe I should stay with the symlink solution for a while...
> Building static binaries should be avoided unless you have a really good > reason. They're an order of magnitude larger, and less efficient. I > wouldn't consider openssl a good reason. -- Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux We Trust. news://news.hkpcug.org / v \ http://www.linux-sxs.org news://news.linux.org.hk /( _ )\ http://www.linuxfromscratch.org ^ ^ http://beyond.linuxfromscratch.org For starters: http://new.linuxnow.com/tutorial/preface.html _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
