The "symlink method" doesn't always work for everything. On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, m.w.chang wrote:
> > that means i have to recompile all programs that depends on openssl? > doh... maybe I should stay with the symlink solution for a while... > > > Building static binaries should be avoided unless you have a really good > > reason. They're an order of magnitude larger, and less efficient. I > > wouldn't consider openssl a good reason. > > > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Lonni J Friedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Step-by-step & TyGeMo http://netllama.ipfox.com _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
