Joel Hammer wrote:
Thanks for the scan. These ports I expected to be open, except for 1024
(kdm). I just wonder why ShieldsUp didn't detect these ports.
I have noticed most scanners tend to do the well known ports if you scanned every port it would take a long time. so they mostly look at the well knowm vulnerable ports i.e. 21, 25, 80, 135, etc.


-- James McDonald Systems Engineer Singleton NSW Australia

61+ (0)2 6570 1556 (bh)
61+ (0)2 6571 2401 (ah)
61+  0428 320 219  (mob)



_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.linux-sxs.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to