--- Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 16:23:47 -0500 Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Saturday 07 July 2001 09:44 am, you wrote:
> > > Does anyone know the difference between these devices with respect
> to
> > > ide-scsi support?
> > >
> > > Advice on this group has always ben to use sr0&1, but Gentoo
> recommends
> > > scd0&1.  I can get cds to mount using scd0&1, but will this work
> for
> > > burning cdroms (the xxx0 device is a cdrw).
> > >
> > > TIA
> > 
> > Collins
> > 
> >  Great Question, I have the same problem. 2 scsi drives bus 2 ID 4 &
> 5, also 
> > a IDE cdrom on bus 1 at hdc, really IDE bus 2 primary slot. Having
> real 
> > problems here with this. 
> 
> After reading the kernel docs on devices (if all else fails, RTFM), I
> don't get a definitive answer.  The kernel folks describe /dev/srn for
> ide-scsi, then remark "some also use scdn".  Apparently, they are
> equivalent.
> 
> I don't have a clue about your problem, Rick, since I don't have any
> real scsi devices.

I had this fight with an external SCSI PLextor CD burner this past week.
 However, ide-scsi stuff has no relation to SCSI hardware, its only for
IDE.  
My IDE CD burner at home is accessed as /dev/sr0.  The SCSI burner at
work can be mounted as /dev/sdd0 (very weird), but when i go to burn, i
don't even bother with the device, i just use the scsibus,target,lun
format in cdrecord. You could also use this for the IDE burners, BTW.

=====
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lonni J. Friedman                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Linux FAQ & Step-by-step help:    http://netllama.ipfox.com

                                                 .

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc 
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to