On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:52:19 +0800 Linuxism CHANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You meant eWorkstation really won't have BIND?
> argh.. I just managed to get BIND working in eDesktop 2.4.
> Learn again.. geee.....
> Does DJBDNS convert old BIND files? I got five to deal with.
>
> named.conf
> /var/named/root.hints
> /var/named/127.0.0
> /var/named/192.168.2
> /var/named/mydomain.org
>
> >>ON further checking, I found that the distribition doesn't have BIND.
> > Now would be a really good time to switch over to djbdns, which is
> > supposed to be a lot more secure. Bernstein will even pay you money
> if
> > you find a security hole.
> >
> >
>
I don't rember. Bernstein's home page is http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html.
BTW, the 3.1 Beta did have bind installed. That was the way I ran it
initially.
>
>
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
> ->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
--
Collins Richey
Denver Area
Gentoo_rc5 XFCE
_______________________________________________
http://linux.nf -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives, Subscribe, Unsubscribe, Digest, Etc
->http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
