On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 18:44:57 -0500 Douglas J Hunley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
---snip--- > not really what you asked for, but since you're doing this, might as well go > 2.4 ... it seems to be the most stable 2.x glibc yet from what I've seen/heard > -- Doug, was that version number supposed to be 2.2.4??? -- ****************************************************************************** Registered Linux User Number 185956 http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&group=linux 10:40pm up 15 days, 5:45, 2 users, load average: 0.12, 0.13, 0.09 _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users