Tony Alfrey wrote:
> 
> On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote:
> <snip>
> >
> > Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least
> > theey work with.
> 
> Thanks.  The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS.  I
> looked at rpm.org and it looks the numbering is 3.0.blahblah until it
> kicks in to 4.0.   So I assume that you also mean 3.0.6???
> I'm fussing with that but have failed dependencies that I know I have.
> I'm tempted to get the source and compile the silly thing.
> Your suggestion??

I thought Skippy went through this not long ago, can you not d/l a pre
compiled binary version to run?  Or am I inventing memories?
-- 
Linux SxS [http://sxs.webhop.net]
_______________________________________________
Linux-users mailing list
Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users

Reply via email to