Tony Alfrey wrote: > > On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote: > <snip> > > > > Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least > > theey work with. > > Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I > looked at rpm.org and it looks the numbering is 3.0.blahblah until it > kicks in to 4.0. So I assume that you also mean 3.0.6??? > I'm fussing with that but have failed dependencies that I know I have. > I'm tempted to get the source and compile the silly thing. > Your suggestion??
I thought Skippy went through this not long ago, can you not d/l a pre compiled binary version to run? Or am I inventing memories? -- Linux SxS [http://sxs.webhop.net] _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users