On Tuesday 18 December 2001 06:33 am,Ian wrote: > Tony Alfrey wrote: > > On Monday 17 December 2001 09:24 pm,Keith Antoine wrote: > > <snip> > > > > > Many newer rpms will not work with that version 3.6 is the least > > > theey work with. > > > > Thanks. The LlamaDude sent me out to get a 3.0.6 from the SxS. I > > looked at rpm.org and it looks the numbering is 3.0.blahblah until > > it kicks in to 4.0. So I assume that you also mean 3.0.6??? I'm > > fussing with that but have failed dependencies that I know I have. > > I'm tempted to get the source and compile the silly thing. Your > > suggestion?? > > I thought Skippy went through this not long ago, can you not d/l a > pre compiled binary version to run? Or am I inventing memories?
I think you are absolutely correct; I remember the long thread and I'm loathe to go dig it up. I'm hoping for a summary of the right solution. I loaded the rpm but I'm getting failed dependencies for libraries that I know I have so I'm stuck. -- Tony Alfrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] "I'd rather be sailing" _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list Archives, Digests, etc at http://linux.nf/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
