P.S. On 03/05/11 13:56, Derek Smithies wrote: > Thoughts on the interface: > The UI is definately snappier, and is more conservative on screen real > estate. > Quoting from "somewhere", > The purpose of the X interface is to allow more information to be > displayed on the screen
It seems significantly slower to load, to me. (PentiumD-2800, onboard graphics, 4GB). > Unity does this better than gnome (my opinion). > So far, I don't have a replacement for the system monitor which runs in > the bar at the > bottom. My preference is to see a graphical representation of network > traffic and cpu usage. > However, I think I could be alone in this, as mac and windows don't > display this information > in the taskbar. My feeling is that cpuusage/network usage is only > relevant to a small segment > of the population (relevant to geeks in other words) I too like the system monitor graphs, but won't be giving them up. Good luck ~/rik _______________________________________________ Linux-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.canterbury.ac.nz/mailman/listinfo/linux-users
