Hi, At Wed, 9 Jan 2002 17:26:47 -0500 (EST), Henry Spencer wrote:
> I have no bias on the subject mostly because I have no opinion on the > subject. :-) I don't claim to know what the general opinion in Japan > about Unicode or Han unification is (or would be). Sophism. For example, you may be interested in Unicode and you may hope Unicode to be popular as soon as possible. You may not care about native Japanese speakers' interest. How do you suspect about my opinion? I said that I hopes Unicode to be usable for native Japanese people. I sometimes criticise Unicode because I hope Unicode to be more useful. I don't criticise Unicode because of hate for Unicode. What's wrong about this position? What bias do you think? For myself, I graduated a University, which may mean my knowledge on Kanji characters is above the avearge Japanese people. Thus, I may be biased that I know some more Kanji characters than average Japanese people. However, my job is not related to computer, publication, typesetting, nor literature. My knowledge on Kanji may be lower than people with such jobs. I did introduced all which may bias my opinion or feelings. And you? --- Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/ "Introduction to I18N" http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/ -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
