Hi, At Thu, 10 Jan 2002 15:16:36 -0500 (EST), Henry Spencer wrote:
> > What's wrong about this position? What bias do you think? > > There is nothing wrong with this position, but your own strong opinions > make you a rather biased source for information on how Japanese in general > would react to today's Unicode. What is a "strong opinion" do you think? Yes, I have a strong opinion that Unicode should be usable for Japanese people. Who don't think so? Do you think that Unicode don't need to be useful for Japanese people? > My original posting was directed not at you, but at others in the list, > who seemed to be assuming that you represented a consensus of Japanese > opinion. That could be true, but we should not just assume so. If you think I don't represent average Japanese people's opinion, what do you think about the true average Japanese people? How do you prove it is a "true" average? Based on your method to distinguish "biased" and "non-biased" opinion, any criticism would be categorized into "biased" opinion. You will accept only yes-men. Yes-men-acceptors (like you) cannot be free from be biased. How can I prove I am "not-biased"? --- Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.debian.or.jp/~kubota/ "Introduction to I18N" http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/intro-i18n/ -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
