On Saturday 2004.01.10 20:48:31 +0330, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > On Sat, 2004-01-10 at 20:36, Edward H. Trager wrote: > > Is there any good reason why implementors would not support the > > full range of Unicode -- i.e., UTF-8 up to six serialized bytes? > > UTF-8 up to four bytes, you mean. See > <http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3629.html>. >
I guess I was recalling (from http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/unicode.html) that six bytes allows encoding all possible 2^31 UCS code points, although I suppose nothing above plane 1 has been defined. - Ed Trager > roozbeh > > > > -- > Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels > Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/ > -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
