On Sun, 2004-01-11 at 19:00, Keld Jørn Simonsen wrote: > > Recently?!! > > It was maybe 5 years ago.
Do you have more details? I thought you were talking about the Hangul thing. Is this something else? > > > I would say: "be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what > > > you generate", and thus accept valid UTF-8 until the 31 bit. > > > > That is not necessarily good advice in security issues. > > What harm can it be? It will not be characters that are relevant in any > syntactical analyses. Check the section "Security Considerations" in RFC 3629. roozbeh -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
