Kaixo! On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:06:21PM -0500, Edward H. Trager wrote:
> Is there any good reason why implementors would not support the > full range of Unicode -- i.e., UTF-8 up to six serialized bytes? Supporting the handling of the byte stream is easy; the hard part is to display them, for non trivial scripts (a trivial script is a script written from left to right, with a one-to-one relation between character and glyph, and with all caracters taking exactly one column of width (no double width, no combinatory ones)) -- Ki �a vos v�ye b�n, Pablo Saratxaga http://chanae.walon.org/pablo/ PGP Key available, key ID: 0xD9B85466 [you can write me in Walloon, Spanish, French, English, Italian or Portuguese]
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
