On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Robert Brady wrote: > Do ZWJ/ZWNJ interactions matters : i.e. > > FOO ZWJ ZWNJ BAR > > could be rendered as > > <foo-init> <bar-isol> > > Is this important to implement? Unfortunately, Unicode Technical Committee has agreed to the usage of ZWNJ also as a non-ligator recently, and recommends using the sequence ZWJ ZWNJ ZWJ if anyone wants to turn off ligaturing between two Arabic letters. Fortunately, I do not know of anyone who's using that. --roozbeh - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Robert Brady
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: 6x13 Arabic Markus Kuhn
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Mark Leisher
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Robert Brady
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Robert Brady
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Robert Brady
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Robert Brady
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Robert Brady
- Re: ISO 6429 bidi control sequ... Markus Kuhn
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: XTerm Bidi/Arabic Patch Robert Brady
- Re: XTerm Bidi/Arabic Patch Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: XTerm Bidi/Arabic Patch Mark Leisher
- Re: XTerm Bidi/Arabic Patch robert
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Mark Leisher
- Re: XTerm Arabic Patch Roozbeh Pournader
