On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Yes, although we'd need to leave a significant transition period, and not > recycle the code points. As they say in the Unicode standard, we should add a cannonical decomposition, and mark the private codes as deprecated ;) --roozbeh - Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
- VT100 Terminal graphic characters in Unicode 3.2 / UC... Markus Kuhn
- Re: VT100 Terminal graphic characters in Unicode... Frank da Cruz
- Re: VT100 Terminal graphic characters in Uni... Markus Kuhn
- Re: VT100 Terminal graphic characters in Unicode... Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: VT100 Terminal graphic characters in Unicode... Robert Brady
- Re: VT100 Terminal graphic characters in Uni... Roozbeh Pournader
- RE: VT100 Terminal graphic characters in Unicode... Karlsson Kent - keka
- RE: VT100 Terminal graphic characters in Unicode... Karlsson Kent - keka
