> yes, I saw that, but there were only 32. With their philosophy of not
> encoding any new presentation from in the block, i wonder why
> they have not marked all unassigned places in the block as unused.
Well, all unassigned code points are marked "shall not be used" already.
What was needed was to reserve more than 34 (FFFE, ...., 10FFFF)
"not-a-character"s for internal use, and the chosen 32 new ones were handy
(in the BMP, consecutive, and in a block where no more allocations will be
made).
Kind regards
/kent k
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/lists/
