Markus Kuhn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is another iteration of the SCW control function definition, to
> allow users of terminal emulators full control over whether single-width
> or double-width glyphs will be used:
Why don't you use the Unicode tagging mechanism (or some special
Unicode characters)? I think this makes sense even in plain text, and
not only when communicating with terminal devices?
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Paul Williams
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Markus Kuhn
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Paul Williams
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Paul Williams
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Markus Kuhn
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) H. Peter Anvin
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Roozbeh Pournader
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Florian Weimer
- Re: Set Character Width Proposal (Version 3) Markus Kuhn
