Robert de Bath wrote:
>
> This does in fact _conflict_ with revision 5 of ECMA-48 and
> as hpa says section F.4.2 (indirectly) bemoans the fact that
> _NO_ good VT1XX emulator (including the vt220..vt520) ever
> accepts this part of ECMA-48.
Ho ho. They wouldn't be _good_ emulators then, would they? Show me a
real terminal that claims compliance with ECMA-48 rev. 5.
> (NB CSI $w is occupied I don't _think_ the others are, anyone got
> an exaustive list?)
This is only an issue if the sequence is intended to remain private. My
best attempt at the list you're looking for is at
<URL:http://vt100.net/ctrlseq_dec.html>, though it doesn't include the
VT500 series (it's taking ages to get the Programmer's Ref from Compaq).
--
Paul Williams Thales Sensors, Manor Royal, CRAWLEY, RH10 9PZ
Software Design Tel: +44 1293 644540 Fax: +44 1293 542812
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
