Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author: Radovan Garabik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.utf8
> >
> > My understanding is that it's "OK but not ideal" to write "s" or "z"
>
> In commonly used words, but that is considered to be an alternative
> spelling.
>
> Otherwise, it is OKish to write "sh" and "zh" when
> (for technical reasons) politically correct "š" and "ž"
> are not available. In practise, nobody cares and everyone uses sh and zh.
>
Right, my goof: "sh" and "zh" is the appropriate substitute spellings.
Again, as you say, in practice noone cares and use them; they don't
even exist on standard keyboards.
-hpa
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> at work, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
