On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 01:44:03PM +0900, Gaspar Sinai wrote: > Which pretty much shows that there is an ambiguity and the > algorithm should change. My argument would be: if it needs to be > changed anyway can it be changed to make digital signatures easier > and put scripts, like Old Hungarian (rovasiras) in it that can be > written in both directions?
The Unicode standard and the standards concerning digital signatures are separate. Fixing Unicode doesn't imply any changes in signatures. > I could not reach this level in my arguments because I was told > that there is no problem at all and I felt I have two choices: > being violent or just silently unsubscribe from the list. I > chose that latter. You showed that there are problems with bidi rendering, and I don't think anyone disagreed with that. Your example was too contrived for people to consider it a major problem. (By the way, I don't think "violent" is the word you're looking for, unless you think your first choice was to mailbomb the list or something. :) -- Glenn Maynard -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
