On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Glenn Maynard wrote: [...] > > I could not reach this level in my arguments because I was told > > that there is no problem at all and I felt I have two choices: > > being violent or just silently unsubscribe from the list. I > > chose that latter. > > You showed that there are problems with bidi rendering, and I don't think > anyone disagreed with that. Your example was too contrived for people to > consider it a major problem.
Thank you for accepting that however small it is, there is a problem. At first I thought there is a contradiction between this and what appeared after I presented the second example on [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list: On Mon, 4 Feb 2002Michael (michka) Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > The only issue though is that we do not have a problem, here? Then, On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 Michael Everson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > We like Unicode. We work to make it better. Sometimes people > come to us with problems that aren't problems, or raise issues > that have been dealt with many times before. Sometimes people > bring us real problems that need real solutions. We're an > intelligent bunch, methinks, and we can tell the difference. > Unicode may have warts, but it's a lot better than ISO 2022. So as I said at first glance there seemed to be a contradiction because some people did accept there is a problem: On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > Why would that fix the problem? But this moring - as I was watching on TV that the US troops stationary in Japan might increase - it came like a flash: The problem is solved! I humbly admit this problem is solved and I will write a header to the original page accordingly. I won't remove the whole page however, because I don't want to confuse people reading mailing list archives. Thank you all for the help, Gaspar --- Listar v1.0.0 - job execution complete. -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
