> 
> seer26 wrote on 2002-11-24 17:26 UTC:
> > > 
> > >o Red Hat Linux now installs using UTF-8 (Unicode) locales by default in
> > > languages other than Chinese, Japanese, or Korean.
> > 
> > Any information about why CJK isnt UTF-8 by default?

  I was disappointed that they had decided against using UTF-8 for
CJK locales. So, I filed a bug and hopefully next RedHat will use
UTF-8 for all locales.  See 
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75829> for
more details.

> >I'd suspect the usual reasons discussed here many times before:
> 
>   - narrow/wide glyph width practice with UTF-8 under xterm differs from
>     traditional CJK width system

  Well, this was resolved in recent xterm. I submitted a patch to add
an option 'cjk_width' and it's put in several months ago. 


>   - CJK users have already had multi-byte encodings with which they are
>     happy, therefore they have far less pressure to move away from the
>     traditional schemes than users of European, African, etc.
>     languages with their traditional single-byte charset mess.

    What you wrote may be true of Japanese some of whom don't like
Unicode in general. However, at leasat 'being happy' part is far  from
true for Koreans.  Koreans were never happy with EUC-KR and other
multibyte encodings devised for Korean because none of them is good
enough for the full support of Korean.  U+1100 Hangul Conjoining Jamo
block is by far the best way to represent Korean fully(it'd have been
even better had they just encoded basic Jamos - 17L's, 11V's and 17T's
cutting out all unnecessary cluster-Jamos) and we've been moving very
rapidly on this front recently (Mozilla and Pango will be able to render
all possible combinations of Jamos - alphabets - found in existing text
when my patch go in. Besides, we have a full-fledged input module for gtk
that exclusively works in terms of U+1100 Hangul Jamos.)  Whether they
actually made a move to UTF-8 or not (say, when making their web pages,
writing emails, and so forth), virtually no one in Korea disputes that
we need to move on to UTF-8 asap.

   Jungshik 

--
Linux-UTF8:   i18n of Linux on all levels
Archive:      http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/

Reply via email to