Keld =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rn?= Simonsen wrote on 2005-02-18 18:47 UTC: > Well, that is not so. for many languages it is better to run something > else than UTF-8.
This statement was certainly true two years ago, probably even last year. However, there has been enormous progress since. In particular the fact that SuSE manages today to do a pretty good job with UTF-8 as their default encoding for *all* languages suggests that this is really no longer the case as of 2005. Markus -- Linux-UTF8: i18n of Linux on all levels Archive: http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/
