Étienne Bersac wrote: > Hi, > >>> Is it a bug of permissions or ownership ? >> Ownership. > > What do you get ? What do you expect ? >
Seems I was too tired yesterday. False alarm, everything is fine. >> Please apologies me for the confusion. I meant the following snippet >> from isight.rules.in: >> >> RUN+="@prefix@/lib/udev/ift-load -f /lib/firmware/isight.fw" >> >> becomes (with --prefix=/) : >> >> RUN+="//lib/udev/ift-load -f /lib/firmware/isight.fw" > > This is the awaited behaviour. What do you expect ? > Well merely a cosmetic thing; note the double "//" in the path above. Should probably be: RUN+="/lib/udev/ift-load ... > >> Firstly in order to make the udev rule to get executed I had to change >> SUBSYSTEM=="usb_device" to "usb". "usb_device" seems deprecated. As you >> can see there is no USB_DEV nor USB_BUS here: >> >> declare -x ACTION="add" >> declare -x DEVICE="/proc/bus/usb/005/003" >> declare -x DEVPATH="/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.7/usb5/5-4/5-4:1.0" >> declare -x DEVTYPE="usb_interface" >> declare -x INTERFACE="255/255/255" >> declare -x MODALIAS="usb:v05ACp8300d010DdcFFdscFFdpFFicFFiscFFipFF" >> declare -x OLDPWD >> declare -x PRODUCT="5ac/8300/10d" >> declare -x PWD="/" >> declare -x SEQNUM="1444" >> declare -x SHLVL="1" >> declare -x SUBSYSTEM="usb" >> declare -x TYPE="255/255/255" >> declare -x UDEVD_EVENT="1" >> declare -x UDEV_LOG="3" > > Which version of udev do you use ? > Version 114 _______________________________________________ Linux-uvc-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/linux-uvc-devel
