On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> They can. But I am about to suggest simply removing the config > directive, and assuming the ``config chip.h'' is always given. The > overhead is almost zero for a zero filled structure. And always > requiring a chip.h would tend to simply the process of writing code > for a new chip. yes, I think Eric is right on this one too :-) ron _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
