"Ronald G. Minnich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > > They can. But I am about to suggest simply removing the config > > directive, and assuming the ``config chip.h'' is always given. The > > overhead is almost zero for a zero filled structure. And always > > requiring a chip.h would tend to simply the process of writing code > > for a new chip. > > yes, I think Eric is right on this one too :-)
I think we probably want to wait a little on this one. YhLu is extremely tight on space right now and I think that needs to be addressed before we require any more slight size increases. Eric _______________________________________________ Linuxbios mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.clustermatic.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
