On Dec 31, 1999 at 15:29, Philip Tellis wrote:
> MM-I-IX (y-m-d)
That's a lot harder to dcypher[1].
> We can't have any problems with years, because the the year MM actually
> has less numerals than the year MCMXCIX which in turn has less numerals
> than the year MCMLXXXIV. Note the significance of that year.
1984? So? Orwell?
On Dec 31, 1999 at 16:26, Binand Raj S. wrote:
> Philip Tellis forced the electrons to say:
Do you have enough proof to prosecute?
> Shouldn't that be MIM? Or is it MCMIC?
Proposed: forget the MCMXCIX crap, let it be MIM. Makes more sense, is
easier to dcypher[1].
What's MLM? 1950?
[1] d.net rival
--
Satya. http://satyaonline.cjb.net/
Mumbai bus guide at http://satyaonline.cjb.net/ !
FREE! Email reminder service at http://satyaonline.cjb.net/rem.html
<<< Hi! I'm a tagline virus! Steal me & join in the fun! >>>
To subscribe / unsubscribe goto the site www.ilug-bom.org ., click on the mailing list
button and fill the appropriate information
and submit. For any other queries contact the ML maintener
