On 1/19/07, jtd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 19 January 2007 12:31, Harsh Busa wrote: > On 1/18/07, jtd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 19 January 2007 11:16, Dinesh Shah wrote: > > > Are you sure? Since he is asking for *OpenSUSE* and not SLES, > > > what you are saying may be incorrect. Please refrain from FUD. > > > :-) > > > > I AWAYS read before shooting off my mouth. But for those who > > havent > > > > From http://www.novell.com/products/opensuse/eula.html
with due respect to fellow luggers emotions fedora eula does not read very different http://fedora.redhat.com/licenses/eula.html fedora is a trademark of RH. which means it is a collaborative work of redhat (correct me if i m wrong ). if you change any software is changed they need to remove fedora trademark individual app license supersede overall license. can somebody compare eula from other linux based os vendors ? HRB -- __________________________ http://www.ebackend.com/blog -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
