On Monday 29 Dec 2008 4:58:58 pm Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ શાહ/दिनेश शाह) wrote: > > You completely misunderstand. Every company exists to provide a > > service. They MAY fail because of many reasons. But they WILL fail if > > they cannot provide the service that they propose in a satisfactory > > way. > > Your argument can be used to validate the M$ success! Since M$ has not > failed so far can lead to point where they can say that they are > providing the products/services in satisfactorily.
that is what they said about enron and merill lynch - take it from me, M$ is on the long slippery slide downhill > > Snip. > > As i said you really need to get the facts from some place other than > > wherever you are getting them from. Periodically we get thoroughly > > misinformed members on the list. However it has been sometime since > > the last one. Cant blame the poor members though, the disinformation > > from M$ and their puppets is huge and the poor reader thinks it's > > great marketing. If anything they are as terrible at marketing as > > they are at tech. > > Isn't it strange that if someone don't agree with you are have views > and opinions opposite ti you becomes M$ puppet? he did not call them M$ puppets - he said they are misled by M$ and it's puppets > Why we never attempt > to learn from our opponents? what exactly do you suggest we learn from M$? > If our opponents are vastly successful > does not always mean that they always employ unfair/illegal practices. in the case of M$ it means precisely that. > They must be doing something right - like not berating and attack > newbies with insults and creating an ecosystem which feed on each > other, however flawed. Actually *you* are the person who specialises in insults. -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate NRC-FOSS http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
