On Tuesday 30 December 2008 23:55, Dinesh Shah wrote: > Reply in-line. > > -- > --Dinesh Shah :-) > +91-98213-11906 > Shah Micro System > http://dineshah.wordpress.com > Sent from iPhone! > > On Dec 29, 2008, at 17:06, Kenneth Gonsalves <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Monday 29 Dec 2008 4:58:58 pm Dinesh Shah (દિનેશ > > શાહ/दिनेश शाह) wrote > > > >> Your argument can be used to validate the M$ success! Since M$ > >> has not > >> failed so far can lead to point where they can say that they are > >> providing the products/services in satisfactorily. > > > > that is what they said about enron and merill lynch - take it > > from me, M$ is > > on the long slippery slide downhill > > Let us stop day dreaming.
Hehe. You are preaching to the wrong section. > As closed source software companies have > accepted and acknowleged the FOSS. Let us also accept that they > are not going away in hurry. We were specifically talking about M$. But most prop software product companies will die. Their demise is a mere side entertainment. But watching M$ trash about without a clue - VISTA ? no it is very sucksessful - while they sink will be fun. According to the press (TOI) Satyam's maintanence of UNs network was pathetic with several cases of network compromises. Satyam is a M$ most valued (whatever) partner. Hmmm... nothing to do with the os i think. -- Rgds JTD -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
