On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 8:24 PM, jitendra <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can we be positive? > Many of us may not even know the mandate of NRCFOSS and whether they are > allowed to venture into all this. > Assuming they are not just wandering into eGovernance but treat that as a > part of the mandate, > > Can we all write to NRCFOSS e.g > > to fund and organise statewise meets on FOSS and egovernance with following > agenda > > 1. Demo Best experiences and practices > 2. bring at least one MP (preferably a minister) to the forum > 3. provide forum for critics > 4. Involve LUG in a transparent way through this kind of mailing list > 5. set example by sponsoring a project in each state that truly answer > the needs > 6. Explain priorities > > with variation as applicable in each state. > LUG meets should discuss such matters online/offline and give concrete > suggestions > ( I donot want to snatch away the fun of the armchair LUGGIST to criticise > one and all. This appeal is for those who wish to contribute also) > -- > http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers > Dear Jituji, Good suggestions. In terms of policy interventions, NRCFOSS has played a very positive role in the past and I guess this is a good occasion as any to acknowledge the same. Venky -- http://mm.glug-bom.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxers
